On the east and north sides of Conway, Republican primary voters in District 56 are faced with two starkly contrasting candidates. Trent Minner is a RINO swamp-endorsed young lawyer and French Hill operative with limited life experience who uses a lot of slick buzz words to describe his milquetoast conservative views. While Minner is tied to the Arkansas swamp, Kim Slaughter is the people’s candidate. Slaughter owns and operates several small businesses in Conway. She subscribes to a literal reading of the Second Amendment, complete medical freedom, unrestricted school choice, and real tax reform (not a band-aid approach). Unlike her opponent, Slaughter isn’t seeking a political career; she only seeks to represent the people of Arkansas with conservative Christian values in the House. In order to reform state government, we must stop electing RINOs and those endorsed and funded by RINOs. We must elect America and Arkansas-first candidates who represent people, not money. That’s why Reopen Arkansas endorses Kim Slaughter in House District 56.
Slaughter policy positions important to Reopen Arkansas:
3.) Military Doctor Testifies in Court: High-Level Command Ordered Her Silence Over Frightening Vaccine Data.
QUOTE:An Army flight surgeon said she was ordered not to discuss military medical data when giving testimony in a case regarding a Navy commander who refused to receive a COVID shot.
Dr. Theresa Long testified COVID shots were resulting in members of the military developing demyelination of the central nervous system, Liberty Counsel reported.
She made that determination while working with Dr. Pete Chambers, a Green Beret surgeon.
They came to their conclusion as they reviewed the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, the military equivalent of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System operated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
When asked during her testimony about data in the DMED, Long, a lieutenant colonel, replied, “I have been ordered not to answer that question.”
“Ordered by who?” queried Judge Steven Merryday of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division.
Long said she was told by high-level command not to bring up military data in her testimony.
Matt Staver of Liberty Counsel, representing the embattled Navy commander, then asked if the data were important and relevant. “Yes,” Long said. “Why?” asked Staver.
Long was nearly in tears, Liberty Counsel reported. She looked at the judge and said, “I have so many soldiers being destroyed by this vaccine. Not a single member of my senior command has discussed my concerns with me.””I have nothing to gain and everything to lose by talking about it,” she added. “I’m OK with that because I am watching people get absolutely destroyed.”
She said she is continually contacted by individuals injured by the shots, “predominantly pilots, and pilots have to meet one of the highest fitness standards.”
1.) Meet Doc Washburn tonight in North Little Rock
2.) 5 ways DOD’s recalibrated health surveillance data looks like a fraudulent attempt to cover vaccine injury
QUOTE:For the past two months, and possibly even earlier, the Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division has beensystematically changing the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) health surveillance data for active-duty soldiers without any transparency. Where are the congressional inquiries?
On Jan. 24, attorney Thomas Renz brought three named military doctors as whistleblowers to Sen. Ron Johnson, and many more who submitted private affidavits, attesting to the fact that DMED showed a massive increase in numerous diagnosis codes ranging from cancers, blood disorders, and heart ailments to strokes, nervous system disorders, and reproductive issues. They attested in sworn statements that the increase in the data reflected their clinical experience in the military over the past year and is, in their professional opinion, the result primarily of mass vaccine injury from the COVID shots.
In a bizarre twist, the military went on to change the data in the ensuing days without ever conducting a formal investigation into what went wrong or releasing a statement to the public. Rather, a week later, in a terse statement to PolitiFact, of all places, officials claimed the high numbers for 2021 were indeed correct, but that there was a glitch in the data for 2016-2020 used by the whistleblowers to establish a baseline, rendering those years way too low.
QUOTE: It’s very possible that two things can be true at the same time — that coincidently, there was a long-standing problem with the military health surveillance and there was mass vaccine injury. But what is clear is that the government’s current data appears to be fraudulent, its narrative behind the data problem is nearly impossible to believe, and officials’ behavior and statements since January are unacceptable.
Based on what we already know from VAERS, excess mortality rates, and insurance data around the world, there clearly is a degree of vaccine injury that is not being reported. The totality of the DMED data still shows these concerns in many categories. At the same time, the data is now completely sabotaged, and it’s unclear whether there were long-standing problems with the data from day one. The concern of vaccine injury and a damaged health surveillance system are vital to national security and are equally as problematic. Yet, our government wants us to believe that the first problem doesn’t exist and the second problem was instantly fixed. Clearly, there is more to the story.
3.) CDC Removes 24 Percent of Child COVID-19 Deaths, Thousands of Others
QUOTE:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has removed tens of thousands of deaths linked to COVID-19, including nearly a quarter of deaths it had listed in those under 18 years old.
The health agency quietly made the change on its data tracker website on March 15.
“Data on deaths were adjusted after resolving a coding logic error. This resulted in decreased death counts across all demographic categories,” the CDC says on the site.
The CDC relies on states and other jurisdictions to report COVID-19 deaths and acknowledges on its website that the data is not complete.
But the statistics are often cited by doctors and others when pushing for COVID-19 vaccination, including figures who believe virtually all children should be vaccinated. Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC’s director, cited the tracker’s death total in November 2021 while pushing for an expert panel to advise her agency to recommend vaccination for all children 5 to 11 years old.
1.) Suit filed on behalf of military service members
Defending the Republic has filed suit on behalf of a group of military service members in the Middle District of Florida – Tampa Division, asking a federal court to uphold their constitutional and statutory rights to refuse the experimental COVID-19 injections mandated by the Department of Defense. These service members, who have risked their lives for their country, have sincerely held religious beliefs which require abstention from the COVID-19 injections. This right of refusal is supported by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. They have been denied this right, and forced to choose between their jobs and the jab. Our military deserves better and we are fighting on their behalf. After sacrificing so much, these patriots deserve to have their voices heard and their rights upheld.
2.) Airlines to Biden: We’ve had enough of mask mandates
QUOTE:More accurately, customers of ten airlines have grown fed up with mandated mask wearing for hours on end. Their CEOs have published an open letter to Joe Biden asking him to end the mandate for air travel as well as any “predeparture testing requirements.” These “no longer make sense in the current public health context.”
The letter comes after Biden pledged to veto any congressional action lifting the mandates.
Furthermore, travelers know full well that mask mandates are unnecessary. Some people might still choose to mask, especially those with particular vulnerabilities, but most probably would look at case counts and shrug — especially if they’ve been vaccinated and/or exposed before. Having flight attendants enforce a mandate that accomplishes nothing but hours of discomfort for no good purpose puts them in an unfair and potentially dangerous position, a point that the CEOs raise specifically in their letter to Biden.
So will Biden finally back down? Probably not, although you can bet that the airlines will start putting pressure on Congress to act anyway. It’s time for consumers to do the same. We have vaccines, widespread natural exposure, and lots of ways to treat COVID-19. The time for mandates has come to an end, except for those who fell in love with the power that created the mandates in the first place. And that’s a bigger problem than wearing masks.
3.) 2021 Annual U.S. Life Insurance Sales Growth Highest Since 1983
“Three in 10 Americans tell us they are more likely to purchase coverage due to COVID-19,” said David Levenson, president and CEO, LIMRA, LOMA and LL Global.”
4.) British Airways and Virgin Atlantic Embrace Freedom, Remove Mask Mandates on Flights
QUOTE:British Airways has become the world’s first major airline to remove mask mandates onboard the aircraft for passengers from Wednesday, in a move shortly followed by Virgin Atlantic.
Britain’s second-largest airline firm announced on Tuesday that they will no longer require passengers to wear masks on board their planes and will instead allow people to “make a personal choice” on the matter.
Virgin Atlantic also announced that they will be dropping mask requirements, albeit with a more graduated approach, by starting with removing mask requirements for passengers travelling between London or Manchester and the Caribbean from Wednesday.
“As we learn to live with Covid and with the legal requirement to wear a face mask now removed in England, we believe our customers should have the personal choice whether to wear a mask on board, on routes where international regulations around mask-wearing do not apply,” said Corneel Koster, Virgin Atlantic’s chief operating officer.
1.) Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity studies were NOT done because… the WHO
We don’t know if the COVID jabs cause cancer or DNA damage. Why were genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies not conducted on the COVID mRNA vaccines? Read on to find out why…
East and south of Fort Smith, voters in District 47 have a unique opportunity to replace a RINO in the state legislature with a constitutional conservative. Lee Johnson, a medical doctor who bought into the whole hospital association Covid narrative, has been problematic to conservatives for four years in the legislature. His opponent, Wade Dunn, believes in a literal reading of the constitution, including the 2nd amendment. Dunn calls for an end to Covid hysteria and will stand firmly against both governmental and employer mandates. He pledges to always put the individual first above corporate interests. A vote for Wade Dunn is the equivalent of flipping a House seat. Reopen Arkansas is pleased to endorse Wade Dunn in House District 47, and we look forward to him fighting in the state legislature for complete individual and medical freedom.
Dunn policy positions important to Reopen Arkansas:
