Month: January 2024

This is an excellent analysis of the CV jab injuries, especially the first 45 minutes: https://rumble.com/v46lqd9-rep.-marjorie-taylor-greene-leads-a-hearing-on-injuries-caused-by-covid-19-.html

• On January 24, 2022 (approximately one week before the FDA announced its approval of Spikevax), Moderna informed the FDA that it had “no plan to produce BLA [biologics license application] SPIKEVAX labelled material.” This is significant for a number of reasons. First, BLA vaccines are subject to stricter testing and safety standards than Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) vaccines. Second, United States armed service members were mandated by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin to receive COVID-19 vaccines; he could only issue this order if the vaccines were “FDA approved.” However, the FDA (and the Department of Defense) knew that Moderna would not be providing the “approved” vaccines to the military. Third, it misled the public that they were getting “approved” vaccines while actually receiving EUA vaccines approved under lesser standards.
• Moderna records revealed the trial participants that acquired shingles (Herpes Zoster) soon after receiving the vaccine. For example, a 49 year-old female test subject had shingles approximately 10 days after receiving the second shot of the Moderna vaccine. Another participant, a 67 year-old female, was diagnosed with shingles only 3 days after receiving the first Moderna shot.
• In one table submitted to the FDA, Moderna concluded that the vast majority of “Adverse Events of Herpes Zoster” were not related to its vaccine. Exactly how those suspicious and self-serving determinations were made is unknown.
• The FDA noted “an imbalance of herpes zoster cases in the mRNA-1273 arm versus the placebo arm.”
• For trial participants who received the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, “The majority of [herpes zoster] events occurred after the 1st dose (43.9%) with 19.3% of all events occurring <7 days after the first dose.”
• One Moderna spreadsheets submitted to the FDA indicated a disturbing number of “less serious” adverse events within 10 days of vaccination, including fever, vomiting, chills, and gland swelling.
• Spreadsheets detailing trial participants who received the Moderna vaccine and developed swelling of the lymph nodes. There were excess reports of lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes) as compared to the placebo.

Read the documents for yourself, here: https://defendingtherepublic.org/moderna-dec-production/

A whistleblower has found: 253 deaths from just 837 vaccine shots at one site. That’s a 30% death-rate.

Recently, a New Zealand Ministry of Health employee went public with a COVID vaccine database that proves the “vaccine” shots are actually killing people.

The whistleblower noticed that too many people were dying immediately after getting vaccinated for COVID. He called himself “Winston Smith” and he sat for an interview with Liz Gunn explaining the damning evidence from the COVID vaccine database.

https://www.emerald.tv/p/new-zealands-covid-data-analyst-has

QUOTE: Parents challenging Rhode Island’s school mask mandate scored a major court victory last week that will greatly impact how the state handles potential future public health outbreaks.

The legal saga began in September 2021, when several Rhode Island parents filed a complaint in Providence County Superior Court against Democrat Gov. Daniel McKee and Nicole Alexander-Scott, the director of Rhode Island’s Department of Health (RIDOH), over the state’s then-enacted school mask mandate. In response to the Covid outbreak, then-Democrat Gov. Gina Raimondo issued an executive order on March 9, 2020, declaring a state of emergency. From that date until July 2, 2021, Raimondo and McKee — who took office in March 2021 — issued a combined 78 executive orders related to Covid.

While McKee and RIDOH lifted the school mask mandate in March 2022, parties in the case continued to engage in litigation for the next year and a half. On Dec. 12, they agreed to a settlement that commits RIDOH to follow the normal regulatory process and hold public hearings “on whether masking in schools is efficacious and safe.”

https://substack.com/redirect/2da69e77-891b-4565-96ba-f2c1fa45d798?j=eyJ1IjoiMmUxY2FsIn0.aGROOmEuAH_toaDS2kmmHKY2uItOgHjCq2qfbI9HWXs

QUOTE:  Adam Creighton, Australian journalist and the Washington correspondent for The Australian wrote:
On the last day of November Texas launched extraordinary legal proceedings that could have wide-ranging political ramifications across the developed world.

Following a lengthy state investigation, Republican Attorney-General Ken Paxton sued pharmaceutical giant Pfizer for “false, deceptive, and misleading acts and practices” related to its Covid-19 vaccines.

Paxton didn’t mince words. “We are pursuing justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were coerced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold by lies,” he said in his November 30 statement.

“The facts are clear. Pfizer did not tell the truth about their Covid-19 vaccines. Whereas the Biden administration weaponised the pandemic to force illegal public health decrees on the public and enrich pharmaceutical companies, I will use every tool I have to protect our citizens who were misled and harmed by Pfizer’s actions.”

The allegations make for shocking reading, even for someone who has followed the Covid wars closely.

Pfizer appears to have exaggerated the effectiveness of its vac­cines, making unfounded claims that routinely were parroted by governments, health officials and much of the mainstream media.

It’s not only Texans who have started to question the wisdom of forcing experimental vaccines with two months of clinical trial data on hundreds of millions of people. Australian academics Peter Parry and Peter Rhodes, in a forthcoming paper in journal Pathology – Research and Practice, lay out what they call “a historic public health disaster”.

Texas is suing under the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. What’s on trial isn’t merely Pfizer but the institutions of governance in the developed world. If Texas wins, it will have highlighted perhaps the greatest medical fraud in history, and the abject failure of medical regulators on a scale at least as large as banking and financial regulators in 2008.

https://substack.com/redirect/5d7529b8-0f63-426c-98b5-fdb6f0ce9816?j=eyJ1IjoiMmUxY2FsIn0.aGROOmEuAH_toaDS2kmmHKY2uItOgHjCq2qfbI9HWXs