Month: February 2023

Pfizer knew about adverse effects of their injection before they force it on everyone. In the past, this number of adverse effects would have gotten an injection pulled. That Pfizer and the government continue to push this is criminal.

Joseph Gehrett, MD; Barbara Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt at Daily Clout

542 Neurological Adverse Events, 95% Serious, in First 90 Days of Pfizer mRNA Vaccine Rollout. 

16 Deaths. Females Suffered AEs More Than Twice As Often As Males.

QUOTE: The War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) – Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt – produced an alarming review of the neurological System Organ Class (SOC) adverse events found in Pfizer document 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-FEB-2021 (a.k.a., “5.3.6”). This SOC includes altered function of the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves.

It is important to note that the adverse events (AEs) in the 5.3.6 document were reported to Pfizer for only a 90-day period starting on December 1, 2020, the date of the United Kingdom’s public rollout of Pfizer’s COVID-19 experimental mRNA “vaccine” product.

Key points in this report include:

• 542 neurological events, 95% of which were serious, occurred in 501 patients.
• 16 patients died.
• 50% of events occurred within the first 24 hours after injection, equating to over 270 events in a single day.
• 69% of the neurological events affected females, and 31% occurred in males.
• 376 seizures were reported, twelve of which were “status epilepticus,” a rare condition of prolonged seizure or series of seizures that is life-threatening.
• 38 cases of multiple sclerosis.
• 11 cases of transverse myelitis (a destructive inflammation of the spinal cord).
• 10 cases of optic neuritis (inflammation of the optic nerve threatening blindness).
• 24 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, ascending paralysis from nerve inflammation.
• Three cases of meningitis (infection and inflammation of the fluid and membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord).
• Seven cases of encephalopathy (any disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure; hallmark is altered mental state).
• Only adverse events that occurred two or more times are specifically reported in the diagnoses list. There were twenty events that happened once and, thus, were not included.

A resolution has just passed out of committee (as an amendment) that should effectively prohibit computerized voting machines in federal elections.

https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/a-blueprint-for-ending-the-voting

CALL TO ACTION

BACKGROUND:

SB250 seeks to make it more difficult for counties to employ secure paper ballots. After our last action call, legislators were interested in hearing more about paper ballots; however, the Secretary of State and the State Board of Election Commissioners are relentless in their campaign against paper ballots. For some reason (?), they are determined to retain the corruptible ES&S voting computers instead of following the will of Arkansas voters.

For more information on the pitfalls of SB250, click here: https://reopenarkansas.org/2023/02/10/action-call-legislative-interference/

If you haven’t completed the original SB 250 action call (link above), there is still time to do it.  Senator Hammer and Representative Long need to hear that you vehemently OPPOSE SB250.

ACTION:

Contact Secretary of State John Thurston and the State Board of Election Commissioners BEFORE 10AM Thursday. If your time is limited, complete the calls in the order listed below. Tell them (you’re likely to have to leave a message), “I want to register my opposition to SB250. These decisions should be left to the counties.”

John Thurston (Secretary of State): 501-682-1010; arsos@sos.arkansas.gov

Daniel Schults (Director, SBEC): 501-682-1834; daniel.shults@arkansas.gov

Chris Madison (Legal Counsel, SBEC): 501-682-1834; chris.madison@arkansas.gov

Bilenda Harris-Ritter (Commissioner, SBEC): 501-747-7650; bilenda@aol.com

REMINDER:

Legislators, while generally well-meaning, are (possibly unknowingly) spreading misinformation, which is coming from ES&S via the Secretary of State’s office and the State Board of Election Commissioners. Don’t believe the half-truths and inaccuracies you are hearing.

BACKGROUND:

Senator Dan Sullivan’s SB81 will be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee THIS Monday at 10AM.  Some of our state senators realize how bad our public – county and school – libraries have become, but others need to see just how bad they are.  Our children’s section is filled with alphabet propaganda, transgenderism, and sexuality wholly age inappropriate.  Did you know that at most libraries in Arkansas, any age child can checkout any book, regardless of subject matter, and the parents do not have a right to even know what books their child has checked out?  SB81 aims to hold woke librarians accountable by making them subject to state obscenity laws.  You can read the bill here: https://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/Bills/Detail?id=SB81&ddBienniumSession=2023%2F2023R&Search=

ACTION:

Be at the State Capitol this MONDAY before 10AM.  The Senate Judiciary Committee meets at 10AM in Room 171.  Be sure to arrive early and sign up on the list to testify IN FAVOR OF SB81.

Ways to testify:

1.) Bring an inappropriate book from your local library, especially the children’s section.  Read an excerpt from it at the hearing.  

2.) Bring a print-out of obscene books from your library’s online card catalog.  Mention some of these and give a summary.

3.) Describe your own personal experience with these library books.  Personal stories about you or your children are relatable and helpful.

* Please bring 10 copies of any handouts to pass out to the senators.

Why me?  Why now?:

The leftists will have plenty of people there to testify.  They don’t have jobs.  They aren’t too busy with family activities.  This is why we lose – liberals show up while conservatives keep their mouths shut and stay home.  

We finally have a legislature willing to listen and consider some tough legislation.  Now is the time to show them that the RIGHT is vocal and demanding change.

The United States in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims

from Sidney Powell ….

Defending the Republic, along with Co-counsel Dale Saran and Andrew Meyer, is proud to announce two new class action lawsuits filed against the United States in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for its wrongful conduct in using the Department of Defense’s (DOD) COVID-19 vaccine mandate to punish military service members who lawfully declined the experimental vaccines. 

In these lawsuits – Botello v. United States and Bassen v. United States – Defending the Republic represents current and former members of the National Guard and Armed Forces Reserves (Botello) and former Active-Duty Service Members (Bassen) who were wrongfully discharged or dropped from active service, and as a result were wrongfully denied pay and benefits. The lawsuits seek backpay, restoration of benefits, reinstatement, correction of military records, and damages for systematic violations of religious liberties for a class of 70,000 to 100,000 National Guardsmen and Reservists and over 8,000 former Active-Duty Service Members.

Many of these service members had their religious accommodation requests to the vaccines unlawfully denied, in violation of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. They were subjected to what courts have described as the military’s “sham” process for reviewing religious accommodation requests that amounted to little more than “theater.” Other service members simply refused experimental and unproven COVID-19 vaccines that did not confer immunity and caused significant side effects, including death. 

There is no doubt that these members of the National Guard, Reserves, and Active-Duty members from all branches were capable and ready to serve their country. They should have been allowed to continue to serve with distinction – and without being forced to take these ineffective vaccines. Instead, the Biden Administration retaliated and stripped these heroes of their retirement benefits, reduced their pay, and in the most extreme cases, completely removed them from service. 

The DOD purged over 100,000 service members and would have purged tens or hundreds of thousands more if not for the injunctions in place against five of the six Armed Services. This is the greatest reduction in force since the end of the Cold War and likely the greatest self-inflicted threat to national security and military readiness in our Nation’s history as we face the prospect of war with rival superpowers on multiple fronts around the world.

In reaction to this, the Congress has eliminated the DOD COVID-19 Mandate in the FY2023 National Defense Authorization Act, where nearly 80% of the House and Senate directed Secretary Austin to “rescind” the mandate. “Rescind” is a legal term of art meaning that the mandate is null and void from the beginning and must be undone from the outset with full retroactive effect and to restore all adversely affected service members to the position in which they would have been absent the mandate. The DOD has rescinded the mandate, but it has refused to consider reinstatement or backpay for wrongfully discharged service members.

Defending the Republic will not stand back and let the Biden Administration punish the unvaccinated. These class actions will seek reinstatement and compensation and restore the rights of tens of thousands of the bravest Americans. 
 

SB206 is a good concept. It limits school board member terms and requires candidates to declare whether they are Republicans or Democrats. The bill originally allowed school board members to serve up to 4 two-year terms (8 years total). It has since been amended to allow four four-year terms (16 years total, longer than a single child would be in school).

We like the idea behind this bill; however, we dislike the idea of school board members serving for 16 years. School boards need fresh ideas and a new set of eyes on the administration. If you agree, tell your legislators to FIX SB206 by REDUCING the number of terms. Sixteen years is TOO long!

Contact info:

FIRST: SB206 is in the Senate Education Committee. Contact these senators: https://reopenarkansas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2023-Senate-education-committee.pdf

Excel version: https://reopenarkansas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2023-Senate-education-committee.xls

NEXT: Contact remaining senators:

PDF: https://reopenarkansas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2023-Senators-by-name-PDF.pdf

Excel: https://reopenarkansas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2023-Senators-by-name-Excel.xls

Track the bill here: https://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/Bills/Detail?id=sb206&ddBienniumSession=2023%2F2023R&Search=

“I can see now that the scientific community from the CDC to the WHO to the FDA and their representatives, repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public about its own views and policies, including on natural vs. artificial immunity, school closures and disease transmission, aerosol spread, mask mandates, and vaccine effectiveness and safety, especially among the young. All of these were scientific mistakes at the time, not in hindsight. Amazingly, some of these obfuscations continue to the present day.”

https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630

https://anandamide.substack.com/p/directed-evolution-iii

BACKGROUND:

Our “Republican” supermajority legislature is doing everything it can to shut down the people’s paper ballot movement. SB250 (written by Secretary of State and filed by Senator Kim Hammer) places restrictions on our right to use paper ballots. Specifically, the bill (1) REQUIRES the use of voting computers for the initial count; (2) it REMOVES state funding for the ballots; and (3) it places an undue BURDEN on counties by placing a 24 hour limit on counting. This bill is a slap in the face to conservatives who support election integrity.

ACTION:

Contact the sponsors of SB250 (below). Tell them you vociferously oppose SB250. We have texted them the following, but please use your own words. Feel free to incorporate points above:

“SB250 is problematic at best. It restricts our right to paper ballots and each county’s right to employ them. Let the process play out and allow each quorum court to decide what is best for their county WITHOUT the additional restrictions of SB250.”

You can read the bill here:

Mike Lindell even mentioned SB250 on TV Friday night:

SOLUTION:

Arkansas is in need of comprehensive election reform. If the legislature is serious about election integrity, they should immediately consider and pass these bills. Proposed bill 7, starting at page 35, specifically addresses paper ballots.

https://arkansasvii.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/AVII_Full_Legislation.pdf